What Are the Key Advantages of Incremental Encoders Over Absolute Encoders?

What Are the Key Advantages of Incremental Encoders Over Absolute Encoders?

In the fast-advancing world of industrial automation, precision and reliability are everything. Whether you’re designing a robotic arm, upgrading a CNC system, or integrating motion control into packaging machinery, choosing the right type of rotary encoder—absolute vs Incremental Encoders—can make a real difference.

While both technologies measure rotation and position, they operate on different principles and serve different needs. But here’s the kicker—when it comes to simplicity, cost efficiency, and high-speed feedback, incremental encoders often hold the upper hand.

So, what exactly gives incremental encoders the edge? Let’s dive deeper.


How Incremental Encoders Work

An encoder converts mechanical motion into digital electrical signals. These signals are essential for motor control systems, automation equipment, and feedback loops in industrial applications.

Two main categories exist:

  • Absolute encoders: Each shaft position corresponds to a unique digital code. When powered back on, the system knows the exact position immediately—no reference needed.
  • Incremental encoders: They output pulses as the shaft rotates. The system counts these pulses to determine position and speed, usually referencing a starting point or “home” position after startup.

Here’s a quick comparison:

FeatureAbsolute EncoderIncremental Encoder
Output typeBinary word (digital code)Pulse train (A, B, Z channels)
Position memoryNon-volatile (remembers position)Volatile (needs reset)
CostHigherMore economical
ResolutionVery high (depends on bit depth)High and adjustable
Common useRobotics, precision positioningServo drives, speed monitoring, general automation

Why Many Engineers Choose Incremental Encoders

If your application values speed, reliability, and cost control, incremental encoders may be your best bet. Here are the main reasons why.

1. Simplicity Equals Reliability

Incremental encoders are mechanically and electronically simpler. They have fewer internal components, making them more robust in harsh environments—think dust, vibration, or high-speed rotation. Simplicity also translates to shorter lead times and lower failure rates, which any B2B purchaser can appreciate.

2. Cost Efficiency Without Compromise

In industrial projects where you might deploy dozens—or hundreds—of encoders, cost adds up quickly. Incremental encoders offer significant savings while still meeting performance requirements for most motion feedback tasks.

This cost-to-performance ratio is one reason why incremental encoders dominate in servo motors, elevators, conveyors, and printing machines.

3. High-Speed Feedback and Resolution

Incremental encoders excel in velocity feedback. They can transmit precise pulse frequencies proportional to shaft speed, providing excellent real-time speed control.

Some types, such as optical incremental encoders, can achieve resolutions up to tens of thousands of pulses per revolution (PPR). Engineers often pair them with frequency multipliers or interpolation circuits for even greater precision.

4. Easy Integration With Control Systems

Most PLC systemsmotion controllers, and servo drives are already optimized for incremental encoder signals—specifically the A, B, and Z channels. This plug-and-play compatibility means:

  • No need for special hardware interfaces.
  • Simplified wiring and maintenance.
  • Faster commissioning during production line setup.

5. Flexible Customization

Need a specific shaft size, output type (TTL, HTL, Push-pull, Open Collector), or connector standard? Incremental encoders offer unmatched customization for diverse industrial standards.


Key Applications in Modern Industries

Incremental encoders play a vital role in a wide range of automation sectors. Some examples include:

IndustryCommon ApplicationsBenefits
RoboticsArm joint control, wheel odometryReal-time motion feedback, smooth motor control
Packaging MachineryCutter position, speed synchronizationAffordable precision, fast signal processing
CNC and Machine ToolsSpindle control, feed rate monitoringHigh-resolution feedback, durable design
Elevators & LiftsShaft position monitoringCompact design, reliable pulse output
Material HandlingConveyor synchronizationSimplified control, lower maintenance cost

From industrial automation sensors to manufacturing robotics, incremental encoders continue to deliver stable and repeatable results, driving efficient production on every level.

Linear encoder 3

When an Absolute Encoder Might Be Better

Of course, absolute encoders do have their place. If your application requires precise position tracking after a power loss, or if you’re working in environments where homing procedures are impractical, the absolute encoder wins hands down.

Here’s a brief side-by-side view:

ScenarioRecommended Encoder Type
Power loss recovery neededAbsolute encoder
Continuous speed monitoringIncremental encoder
Multi-axis roboticsAbsolute encoder
Cost-sensitive automation linesIncremental encoder
Real-time speed controlIncremental encoder
Harsh environmental conditionsIncremental encoder with IP-rated housing

Long-Term Maintenance and Cost of Ownership

While absolute encoders may save time during power-up, incremental encoders typically offer lower total cost of ownership.

Their simpler electronics and standardized output signals make them easier to replace or integrate, even across brands. Suppliers often maintain large inventories and short lead times—ideal for OEM and industrial buyers.

With many manufacturers offering high ingress protection (IP65, IP67) and stainless steel housings, today’s incremental encoders are tougher and more durable than ever.


Choosing the Right Encoder for Your Project

Selecting the right encoder depends on your priorities: position accuracy, speed, cost, or resilience. To make an informed decision, ask yourself:

  • Do I need to know the absolute position upon startup?
  • What is my required resolution (PPR or CPR)?
  • What’s the environmental condition (humidity, dust, vibration)?
  • Which output signal type fits my controller (TTL, differential, open collector)?
  • What’s my expected lifetime and maintenance frequency?

For many engineering teams, the sweet spot between cost, simplicity, and performance often points toward incremental encoders.

If you’re sourcing encoders in bulk or upgrading existing systems, reach out to our team of motion control specialists. We can help you select the right incremental or absolute encoder model for your automation application.


When industries weigh absolute vs incremental encoder choices, it usually boils down to the application’s nature.

If your system demands fail-safe position tracking even after shutdown, the absolute encoder has the edge. But if your focus is cost control, speed feedback, and robust, straightforward performance, incremental encoders remain the go-to solution.

For OEMs, engineers, and industrial buyers seeking performance, flexibility, and availability, incremental encoders deliver consistent results without inflating budgets.

Looking to source high-quality incremental or absolute encoders for industrial automation? Send us your inquiry today—our experts are ready to help you find the ideal encoder for your needs.

FAQ

What’s the main difference between an absolute and incremental encoder?

An absolute encoder provides a unique position value at every angle, while an incremental encoder provides relative position via pulse counts.

Can an incremental encoder provide absolute position information?

Not directly. It requires a reference point, usually established through a homing sequence after startup.

Why are incremental encoders cheaper?

They use simpler circuits and signal processing, reducing component and production costs while maintaining reliable performance.

Are incremental encoders suitable for high-speed applications?

Yes. In fact, they are widely used in high-speed machinery because their pulse output allows real-time velocity detection.

How long do incremental encoders last?

With proper installation and sealing, they can function reliably for thousands of operational hours—ideal for factory automation.

Which encoder type is easier to maintain?

Incremental encoders are typically easier to replace and calibrate due to standardized designs and signal output formats.

Linear encoder 3

Related Posts

What Does PPR Mean in an Incremental Rotary Encoders?

What Does PPR Mean in an Incremental Rotary Encoders?

When working with motion control systems, you’ve probably encountered the term “PPR” in the specifications of an incremental rotary encoders. But what exactly does PPR mean? And why does it matter so much in applications like CNC machines, robotics, automation, and servo motors? In this post, we’ll dive deep into PPR (Pulses Per Revolution), explore how […]

Read More
Understanding the Power of Incremental Rotary Encoder in Motion Control

Understanding the Power of Incremental Rotary Encoder in Motion Control

In the world of automation, robotics, and industrial equipment, precision is more than just a goal—it’s a requirement. That’s where the incremental rotary encoder comes in. This small but mighty sensor has become one of the most essential components for modern motion control systems, ensuring that machines move with accuracy, consistency, and reliability. But what exactly is […]

Read More
Can Incremental Encoders Measure Linear Displacement?

Can Incremental Encoders Measure Linear Displacement?

If you’ve ever wondered whether incremental encoders can measure linear displacement, you’re not alone. Engineers, system integrators, and industrial buyers often face this exact question when designing motion control systems or sourcing encoder solutions for automation projects. Let’s break this concept down in a clear and practical way—no jargon, no fluff, just straightforward insight into how incremental encoders […]

Read More